Nathalie Vega-Rhodes is currently a professor of mathematics and the mathematics technology coordinator at Lone Star College – Kingwood. She specializes developmental education redesign and focuses on researching and create valuable resources for students and instructors. Prior to her time at Lone Star, Vega-Rhodes taught mathematics and college student success courses at other institutions around the Houston area. Vega-Rhodes earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics with a minor in geology from the University of Houston and a Master of Science degree in mathematics from the University of Houston-Clear Lake. In her spare time, she enjoys reading, traveling, and scuba diving.
Technology is advancing exponentially in our world; its use is growing in our classrooms whether we want it to or not. Beetham and McGill (2012) observed that technology is “transforming what it means to work, study, research, express oneself, perhaps even to think.” Bowen (2014) agrees and would further add that this growth has made course design and pedagogy more important than ever. Given this current and irreversible trend, we must harness the benefits of this tool to enhance learning in the classroom.
As instructors, it’s incumbent upon us to leverage technology to engage students as well as organize our courses in a clear and concise manner. Learning management systems (e.g. Moodle, Desire2Learn, Blackboard, etc.) at most institutions are a means by which instructors can manage learning and connect with students. Clearly-named modules, checklists and release restrictions ensure access to relevant information and keep students on track. Additional features such as Intelligent Agents allow instructors to define criteria for automated and personalized communication at critical points throughout the semester.
Other options for creating dynamic courses are college-supported software programs such as Softchalk or Webex. For example, Softchalk can be used to create interactive lessons, while Webex can be used to meet with students virtually, thereby eliminating the age-old problem of providing timely feedback for students who are not present in a traditional face-to-face classroom. Instructors and students can share screens to discuss concepts or work out examples, either one-on-one or in a group. An added benefit of these software programs is that they can be integrated with most learning management systems, making for a seamless student experience.
While proper organization is unquestionably important, by itself it is insufficient. One of the problems that instructors have traditionally faced is lack of available information, which means that instructors may not always know when to intervene or what interventions are necessary. A valuable tool to solve these problems is the analysis capabilities in online homework systems. Easily accessible reports can be used to track progress and determine challenging concepts for individual students or the entire class. This data can be used for evaluating current assignments or improving future courses.
In addition to online homework systems, an easy and convenient way to engage students is by harnessing the capabilities of pervasive smartphone or tablet apps. A few favorites include Attendance (easy recording/reporting of student attendance), Show Me (easy video creation), Notability (note-taking), and Google Voice (texting/phone calls without sharing a personal phone number). Each of these apps have the potential to increase efficiency with everyday tasks.
In summary, these tools, when coupled with thoughtful implementation, can truly impact teaching and learning. McLoughlin and Lee (2008) stated that “technological resources provide opportunities for a range of interactions, communicative exchanges, and sharing, but it is not possible to base an entire sequence of learning episodes based on tools.” Indeed, I am able to do more and better for my students since the immediate feedback allows me to tailor specific solutions based on each student’s needs. I look forward to increased productive interactions with my students using innovations, both present and future.
Bowen, J. A. (2014). The teaching naked cycle. Liberal Education, 100(2), 18-25.
Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547-556. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x
McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.